Climate news

  • SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer

    September 26, 2008 at 9:12 AM EDT

    WASHINGTON — Worldwide man-made emissions of carbon dioxide — the main gas that causes global warming — jumped 3 per cent last year, international scientists said Thursday.

    That means the world is spewing more carbon dioxide than the worst-case scenario forecast by a Nobel Prize-winning group of international scientists in 2007. Scientists said if the trend does not stop, it puts the world potentially on track for the highest predicted rises in temperature and sea level.

  • David Green, Kayhryn Harrison, John Richards and Nancy Olewiler, Special to the Sun Published: Tuesday, June 24, 2008

    Last fall, 70 economists sent a letter to British Columbia's finance minister, Carole Taylor, calling for a revenue-neutral carbon tax. The list of signatories included some of Canada's top economists.

    Since then, the B.C. New Democratic Party has attacked the carbon tax relentlessly, prices at the gas pump have skyrocketed, and now a poll suggests a majority of British Columbians are against the new tax.

  • James Tansey, Special to the Sun. Published: Tuesday, June 24, 2008

    Ipsos Reid reported that the majority of Britsh Columbians are unhappy about the carbon tax. (Generally, people don't claim to love taxes.) But according to earlier Ipsos Reid polls, 77 per cent of Canadians believe climate change is real and 35 per cent believe the environment is the most important issue facing Canada.

  • VANCOUVER — In the effort to minimize contributions to garbage dumps and air pollution while on the road, or while staying at hotels for meetings or conferences, more Canadian companies are demanding green solutions and services when their employees travel for business.

    Follow the link below to the full article

  • Nature reports on moves by business leader to address climate change, in some cases in advance of government regulation. Lots of people have raised concerns about whether businesses can contribute positively to tackling climate change, since industry is seen as the cause of many of the problems.

  • Carbon markets and climate change policy in general are gaining momentum in the US for complex reasons. Industry realizes that if they don't act that there may be legislation but I think there is a more complex reason. In a conversation with two researchers from the National Intelligence Office we sketched out three forces that overlap to drive climate policy: climate change, national security and energy independence. It is becoming clear that part of the backlash against the Iraq war has manifested as a concern about the geopolitics of oil.

  • Sometimes images have more influence than words and scientific data.

    http://news.scotsman.com/edinburgh.cfm?id=1138772007

  • Europe has led the world in the development of indirect taxation systems that seek to modify behaviour. A system co-ordinated across Europe would be more appealing as it would prevent consumers from simply purchasing in a jurisdiction that doesn't apply the same taxes. This already happens with tobacco and alcohol. But it also shows the extent to which a green agenda is being seen as a way of generating revenues in the course of modifying behaviour; part of a wider shift away from direct taxation of income and towards indirect taxation.

  • Wired, July 25, 2007. New research indicates that hacking the atmosphere -- pumping microscopic particles into the stratosphere or clouds to block sunlight and offset global warming caused by greenhouse gases -- is imminently possible. The problem is we could never, ever stop doing it.

  • Wired Magazine, July 24, 2007. Nestled into the fog and forest of San Francisco's Golden Gate Park, the California Academy of Sciences aims to be the world's largest eco-friendly public building when it reopens in 2008. (It's bucking for a platinum LEED green-building certification.) Architect Renzo Piano used a textbook's worth of enviro-engineering tricks for the seven-year effort, an almost total teardown and rebuild. At $484 million, it's one of the most expensive museum projects in a century.